Showing posts with label family. Show all posts
Showing posts with label family. Show all posts

Sep 9, 2013

Internal Medicine Clerkship (Entry 1: First Impression)

So now I'm starting the third week of my internal medicine rotation, and I am loving it. These residents are significantly nicer than the surgery ones (although most of the surgery residents were definitely good human beings), and because of that, I feel like I'm getting more out of the rotation. Basically, I feel forced to learn and study on my own because not looking something up would make my residents disappointed in me and that would break my heart.
Speaking of hearts, and as an example of the previous statement made above, I finally understand EKGs. It's still very difficult for me to determine what the exact diagnosis is, but considering before I could only get rate, I think it's a step in the right direction. Maybe by the end of this rotation I'll feel and sound intelligent! The only drawback--but it's not that bad--is there's a lot of scut work. A lot of using pagers and calling people and talking to nurses, or social workers, or consultation services.
Speaking of scut work, today I was trying to decipher a note, but it was using an abbreviation I didn't know so I sent an e-mail to my surgeon dad to see if he knew what it was (I could of more easily used dr. google, but I like to keep my dad informed of my learning).
ELORA: "Hey dad! Does PCI stand for percutaneous catheter intervention? Thanks!"
FATHER: "I am not sure. That is why acronyms are not welcome in medical practice. It does make sense that PCI stands for percutaneous catheter insertion. It could also stand for pulmonary catheter insertion or pulsatile cardiac imaging. The message is TRY NOT TO USE ACRONYMS unless you are with friends, who cannot judge you. Dad."

Apr 4, 2013

Gender Discrepancies (I/II)

Did you know women and men are actually quite similar? We really are. If we were all raised in a society that interacted with the two genders in the exact same way, we'd probably end up like some gender-neutralized weird race of alien a la Star Trek: The Next Generation. We'd still have the two separate sexes, but we probably wouldn't have this weird, polarized, gender dichotomy. The terms tomboys and janegirls, for example, would no longer make sense and be cast aside like the frivolous trash they are.

Yesterday, in our community groups (which is basically a quarter of our class plus one practicing physician from the surrounding area), we were asked to talk about American health care. We were asked vague questions by our community leader and what ensued was kind of hilarious and also pretty depressing.

On a side note: I talked entirely way too much, which is unfortunate because I hate people who act the way I acted yesterday in class. I will have to implement a more stringent foot-in-mouth policy for any future large discussion groups. I am also a crazy liberal. I need to stop telling people I'm a moderate since I clearly believe that taxes are necessary and the government should govern our personal liberties as little as possible (but I still think we should all have access to affordable health care because it should be a personal liberty).

There were a lot of nuances in our overall debate--this is to be expected since if we could formulate a clear solution to the health care problem in an hour and a half, than our government, as crappy as it is, would already be enacting such solutions as policies nationwide. But in the end, clumping all the nuances together and then defenestrating them because who actually gives a **** about nuances?--there were only two general positions a person could have: you believe Universal Health Care should be guaranteed for everyone or you believe that Health Care should be payed for by individuals in some way outside of paying taxes.

Good points can be made for either side, but as you recall, I threw all those nuances out the window, and it seemed for the most part that the most avid supporters of the opposing sides were also of opposing genders. Universal health care is somehow more appealing to more women than it is to men.

Although clarifying point: my sample size was quite small (n=48) and it wasn't as if no men liked the idea of universal health care. Some favored it. Also, not everyone talked so the real sample size is closer to around 20. So I might just be making up a ton of crap, in which case, I'm sorry if the following is just super offensive. 

I am trying to figure out why that is. Last year when I went to the American Medical Women's Association's National Conference in Miami, the keynote speaker kept commenting on how women are dearly needed in the medical field because women are natural healers and we just care more. It was pretty inspiring but it seemed kind of hurtful to the small amount of dudes I knew who are actually pretty loving people. But now that I think about it, do I actually know any guys who are selfless? Or are they just decent human beings who have yet to have their selflessness tested? How selfless are they, really? Because I don't think caring is quite enough. I care a lot about things but don't actually do anything about it because I am selfish. I really care about making sure people understand that America's  oppressed groups aren't all good to go now that we've slapped band-aids--Title IX and Affirmative Action--on the gaping wound that is injustice. But all I actually do is update my status on Facebook, maybe including a link to a blog article or a recent study.

But when I think about selflessness more, I realize a better question may be: do I know anyone who is selfless? 
Not many.
Well, that's depressing, seeing as I am in Medical School. But I guess everyone isn't being "selfish" per se, just too busy studying so that they can one day be selfless. <<>> This seems too nuanced. I will stop ruminating. 

If we just assume women care more, why is that so? Is it because we have the capacity to become mothers? Because men have the capacity to become fathers, which I have been assured can also be a full time job. Both of my parents were full time Surgeons, and I am sure they both cared about me equally, but I saw my mom much more than I saw my dad, so can we assume my mother was more selfless than my father? I think that is a far argument. Although we will never know for sure because my dad may have thought that by working longer hours, he would be able to give us more opportunities with the money he'd make, and to him, that would seem like a more valuable pursuit than teaching us how to tie our shoes. My dad may have been selfless. Conversely, my mother may have spent more time with us to show the world that she was not only capable of being a woman and a surgeon, but also a loving mother. My mom may have been selfish.

But either way, actions speak louder than words, and I saw my mom more than I saw my dad, even though they had similar jobs. I think this behavior must be socialized, because my mom didn't actually need to spend so much time with us. We could have just had babysitters who stayed at our house longer.

 Now that I've dragged you through my own internal thought process, let me actually tell you facts: female physicians make $17,000-a-year less than male physicians, on average, for doing the exact same amount of work. This number has been normalized, so any arguments that male physicians tend to work longer hours (as was the case for my parents) or that male and female physicians choose to enter different specialties or practice in different locations (as was not the case for my parents) does not at all affect the statistic that women make $17,000 a year less than men for doing the exact same work. Discrimination, of course, plays a role in this inequality, but another interesting point that the researchers brought up was that some of the blame actually falls on women: women will stop negotiating their wages with their employers at a lower rate than their male counterparts. You could see this as women having a lower innate self-worth (which is true in society overall but may not apply to physicians) or you could see this as women willing to do more "caring" for less economic compensation. That sounds a lot like selflessness to me.


Feb 11, 2013

Baby Sunglasses

So today in pathology we learned about my favorite organ, the liver. But sometimes baby livers don't work as well as they should, and so babies are born with jaundice of the newborn (which sounds a lot better than hemolytic disease of the newborn but what do I know about newborns as a barren 23 year old?). Regardless, our professor was explaining that one of her children had this condition fresh out the womb, and they had to keep it overnight at the hospital in a light box*, and it was apparently incredibly traumatic for her. I suppose I can understand her emotional trauma. You're technically supposed to bond with your baby like, as soon as it's born, so to have it in a plastic box would kind of put me on edge. What if the baby ends up liking UV rays more than mommy? And as a young adult in college it gets more oxytocin visiting tanning salons than calling its own mother? Then it probably gets skin cancer (because it's probably white) because it can't stay away from L.A. Tan. #whitepeopleproblems

MY experience with jaundice of the newborn is much more amusing. I was beyond excited/curious during the gestation of my little sister, Erisa. One of my earliest memories is tapping on my mom's stomach to assess whether or not it actually contained a human or if my mom was just being lazy and taking weeks off of work to lie in bed. Regardless, when my baby sister Erisa was born she had a little jaundice. But we got to take her home, and so in the yellow walls of our home's nursery, I got to observe my little sister converting unconjugated bilirubin to photobilirubin while wearing super cool little baby sunglasses that I was hella jealous of. And so began my love/annoyance with my little sister. And my appreciation of cool shades.


*Why would you ever put a newborn in a light box?: You put babies with too much bilirubin/jaundice in light boxes because it converts the insoluble bilirubin into photobilirubin which is soluble and can be excreted in the urine. A lot of bad things can happen if you let bilirubin build up in a newborn, but by far the worst is kernicterus, which is a condition that damages the brain.